Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 18:52:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 18:52:57 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:7697 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 18:52:57 -0400 Message-ID: <3CCB1D18.2010402@evision-ventures.com> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 23:50:16 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020419 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Viro CC: Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] BK license change In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Uz.ytkownik Alexander Viro napisa?: > > On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > >>The best thing would be to stop this egg-dance around open sourceness and >>release BK under GPL. This is wasting too much time. Trying to use a > > > 1001st time, CHOICE OF LICENSE BELONGS AUTHOR OF CODE IN QUESTION, dimwit. > How many times should that be repeated until it sinks down? Anton please please let this discussion going on. It is *very* good at pointing at the people who need an permanent personal entry in my killfile for lkml ;-). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/