Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750746Ab0FAEKf (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 00:10:35 -0400 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:54855 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751250Ab0FAEKd (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 00:10:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 00:10:28 -0400 From: tytso@mit.edu To: Alex Buell Cc: Mailing Lists - Kernel Developers , Eric Paris Subject: Re: Article in Phoronix about loss of performance in 2.6.35 release candidates Message-ID: <20100601041028.GB4426@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: tytso@mit.edu, Alex Buell , Mailing Lists - Kernel Developers , Eric Paris References: <1275347969.29006.5.camel@lithium.local.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1275347969.29006.5.camel@lithium.local.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 815 Lines: 24 On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:19:29AM +0100, Alex Buell wrote: > http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=14976 > > Question: Why? One of the theories that has been advanced is that it's simply this problem: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/22/154 If so, it points out how idiotic Phoronix is about not being able to notice udev pegging the CPU at 100% being someone bad for its benchmark runs. :-) OTOH, this bug has been known for over a week, and it is sort sad that we haven't reverted this patch. It looks like the conversation has died, but without a fix? - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/