Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 22:53:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 22:53:07 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:35245 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 22:53:06 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:43:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020427.194302.02285733.davem@redhat.com> To: jd@epcnet.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VLAN and Network Drivers 2.4.x From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <877576231.avixxmail@nexxnet.epcnet.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: jd@epcnet.de Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 22:34:09 +0200 > We don't call it NETIF_F_VLAN because the hope is that eventually > it will be rare for a network device to not be able to support it. > Not the other day around. I don't know how many cards won't support VLAN nowadays. But i will test these changes with my third party driver (just recompile it against pre-2.4.19) and report the results. This will tell us exactly nothing. It will continue to tell us nothing until I make the change whereby NETIF_F_VLAN_CHALLENGED is set by default and devices known to work are updated to clear it. Please don't bother posting the results, we know what will happen. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/