Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 13:58:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 13:58:29 -0400 Received: from cs145025.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.145.25]:41742 "EHLO chip.2y.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 13:58:29 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:57:59 +0300 (EEST) From: Panu Matilainen X-X-Sender: pmatilai@chip.2y.net To: Pete Zaitcev cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Subject: Re: 1279 mounts In-Reply-To: <20020427213236.A20253@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:25:33 +0300 (EEST) > > From: Panu Matilainen > > > I've got quite a few users here who "need" this functionality and it's > > included in our RH-based custom kernels. Having it as a separate patch > > for 2.4 is no problem, for 2.5 I'm hoping we finally move to 32bit device > > numbers... > > Mind, we only ship the unnamed majors part, but not the NFS part. > There is no word from util-linux maintainer about required > changes to mount(8), so I was cautious about doint that. Sure, I know. In these cases getting the limit from 255 to around 800 is enough so the mount patch isn't even needed. - Panu - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/