Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 06:05:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 06:05:32 -0500 Received: from smtp1.cern.ch ([137.138.128.38]:16397 "EHLO smtp1.cern.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 06:05:24 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 11:34:39 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Alexander Viro Cc: "Mohammad A. Haque" , Ben Ford , Chris Lattner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, orbit-list@gnome.org, korbit-cvs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit Message-ID: <20001209113439.B12659@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> In-Reply-To: <3A31BC6D.1CFB5221@haque.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from viro@math.psu.edu on Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 12:39:36AM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Viro wrote: > > It was just an example. Basically, you'd be able to do in with just > > about any language that has ORBit bindings. > > Yeah... "Infinitely extendable API" and all such. Roughly translated > as "we can't live without API bloat". Frankly, judging by the GNOME > codebase people who designed the thing are culturally incompatible with > UNIX. Agree. I remember a big complaint about Windows was the huge APIs, compared with Unix' tiny list of syscalls. And then I saw the GNOME docs... ew! > "KISS is tough" -- programmer Barbie. ; -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/