Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:44:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:44:17 -0400 Received: from twilight.ucw.cz ([195.39.74.230]:16046 "EHLO twilight.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:44:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 00:44:07 +0200 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: Martin Dalecki Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [bk+patch] Let (WIP) be replaced with (EXPERIMENTAL) Message-ID: <20020429004407.A12673@ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20020428142415.A10747@ucw.cz> <3CCBFAB6.7060607@evision-ventures.com> <20020428212429.A12005@ucw.cz> <3CCC4426.3040303@evision-ventures.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 08:49:10PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote: > > Ok - your decision. If you want, I'll omit the BK part of the patches. > > On the other hand, if you could just forward it to Linus as is (or let > > me send it to Linus after your confirmation), change comments won't get > > lost. > > > >>I preferr a classical diff -urN ;-). > > > > It's included, anyway. > > Yes but why the hell should I bother looking at some uu-encoded stuff? > Jet another reason I think BK is plain ugly. > Anyway. Please send the chipset parts to linus directly. > They seem fine. Ok, I'll send the two changes to Linus. > However the _WIP change is despite beeing correct, not complete > and I will prefer to do it myself. OK? Perfect. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/