Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933491Ab0FCBYX (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 21:24:23 -0400 Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:46039 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932756Ab0FCBYW (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 21:24:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 18:22:01 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Andrew Morton Cc: Marcelo Roberto Jimenez , Alessandro Zummo , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, jaswinderrajput@gmail.com, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, mad_soft@inbox.ru, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dominik Brodowski , Wolfram Sang , kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com, Russell King , rpjday@crashcourse.ca, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Pull request for nanoengine Message-Id: <20100602182201.4fcb3417.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20100602163844.509e9953.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20100602163844.509e9953.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.6; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-Source-IP: acsinet15.oracle.com [141.146.126.227] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4C0703CA.0004:SCFMA922111,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2030 Lines: 47 On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:38:44 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 20:19:01 -0300 > Marcelo Roberto Jimenez wrote: > > > The following is a compilation of all the patches I have done for the > > nanoengine. Some of these are also valid for SA11xx based machines > > like, e.g, sharp Zaurus. > > Which other kernel developer were you hoping would merge this tree? > > > arch/arm/configs/nanoengine_defconfig | 1396 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Kconfig | 8 + > > arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Makefile | 2 + > > arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1100.c | 56 +- > > arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c | 51 +- > > arch/arm/mach-sa1100/include/mach/nanoengine.h | 30 + > > arch/arm/mach-sa1100/nanoengine.c | 115 ++ > > drivers/pcmcia/Makefile | 3 +- > > drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_generic.c | 3 + > > drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_generic.h | 1 + > > drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_nanoengine.c | 219 ++++ > > drivers/pcmcia/soc_common.c | 129 ++- > > drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c | 153 ++- > > I can only think it must have been Russell. > > I've rather lost track of what's happening with ARM subtrees. I > _think_ it's now the case the relevant maintainers are putting their > trees into linux-next directly and are asking Linus to pull them > directly. But maybe that's a misconception. > > Can someone please explain the current state of play? Check this from about 2 hours before your question: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/2/472 (Linus) --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/