Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933515Ab0FCBqj (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 21:46:39 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:42225 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932590Ab0FCBqi (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 21:46:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ssF8uqWzPeyJZuk5Mcwwtv3rcXmWQY3SBV/6dTwwzrNEzBMAwCxOX8TeSEnqj5Tdm5 iMX0/ZUti/aqpHK2PxyKZy0Uk1anEGUaJmDbtQnShk3THVp3B572BHB8eGjgEZeyiClI S3FCPl4uMUjm9+B0T2hFIFGrLq2q+1iBybnhs= Message-ID: <4C070993.2070005@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:46:59 -0700 From: "Justin P. Mattock" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091114 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Garrett CC: Robert Hancock , x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]X86:reboot.c Add some dmi entries to pci_reboot_dmi_table. References: <20100601212901.GA18390@srcf.ucam.org> <4C057EF0.2030808@gmail.com> <4C05E800.1010400@gmail.com> <4C05F3BF.6090503@gmail.com> <4C06ECAA.3060708@gmail.com> <4C06ED18.2010400@gmail.com> <4C06F1DD.8060004@gmail.com> <4C06F6EA.6090701@gmail.com> <20100603013758.GA18755@srcf.ucam.org> In-Reply-To: <20100603013758.GA18755@srcf.ucam.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1236 Lines: 37 On 06/02/2010 06:37 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 05:27:22PM -0700, Justin P. Mattock wrote: >> On 06/02/2010 05:20 PM, Robert Hancock wrote: >>> #include >>> >>> int main() { >>> iopl(3); >>> outb(2, 0xcf9); >>> sleep(1); >>> outb(6, 0xcf9); >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> That's basically what PCI reboot does. >> >> the above code reboot's the machine as it should.. >> I can look at that(need to take a break first though) >> and see.. > > That's pretty infuriating. The ACPI-provided definition doesn't work, > and there's no ACPI mechanism for expressing the more complex cf9 > behaviour. Windows doesn't appear to special case this, so we're > probably left trying to figure out why the keyboard controller method > doesn't work. Sigh. > any ideas on how to find that value? (using showkey does give values but I don't think it gives the low level value as this(but could be wrong)). Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/