Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754022Ab0FCNUS (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 09:20:18 -0400 Received: from serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp ([222.151.198.100]:40933 "EHLO serv2.oss.ntt.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751691Ab0FCNUQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 09:20:16 -0400 Message-ID: <4C07AD0C.8090409@oss.ntt.co.jp> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:24:28 +0900 From: Takuya Yoshikawa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Piggin CC: Eric Dumazet , Jens Axboe , Dan Carpenter , Matthew Wilcox , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton , Oleg Nesterov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Zijlstra , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch v2] fcntl: return -EFAULT if copy_to_user fails References: <20100603100402.GR5483@bicker> <4C07826A.6060302@oss.ntt.co.jp> <20100603103542.GV5483@bicker> <4C07990A.8080508@fusionio.com> <4C079D34.5010500@oss.ntt.co.jp> <1275568683.2456.33.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20100603131031.GM6822@laptop> In-Reply-To: <20100603131031.GM6822@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1605 Lines: 48 (2010/06/03 22:10), Nick Piggin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:38:03PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> Le jeudi 03 juin 2010 ? 21:16 +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa a ?crit : >>> (2010/06/03 20:59), Jens Axboe wrote: >>>> On 2010-06-03 12:35, Dan Carpenter wrote: >>>>> copy_to_user() returns the number of bytes remaining, but we want to >>>>> return -EFAULT. >>>>> ret = fcntl(fd, F_SETOWN_EX, NULL); >>>>> With the original code ret would be 8 here. >>>>> >>>>> V2: Takuya Yoshikawa pointed out a similar issue in f_getown_ex() >>>> >>>> Pretty basic bug, how long has this been there? >>> >>> IIUC, from the beginning, when these were introduced. >> >> Maybe copy_to_user() was changed sometime to return a partial count >> instead of EFAULT ? > > I think it's been like that since first introduced. Some functions > do need to know in order to do partial copies. > > >> I do think we should have a set of helper functions, instead of >> spreading special EFAULT cases in one housand places... >> >> This is really ugly. >> >> static inline int sec_copy_to_user(arg1, arg2, arg3) >> { >> int res = copy_to_user(arg1, arg2, arg3); >> >> return (res> 0) ? -EFAULT : res; >> } > > It would be unfortunate if it adds more confusion. I'd prefer to have > a sufficiently different name. memcpy_to_user/memcpy_from_user > perhaps? Then, and memclear_user() ? > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/