Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755452Ab0FCVeF (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:34:05 -0400 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:55134 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754091Ab0FCVeD (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:34:03 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 72.249.23.125 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18ajK8na0TDVQp1IeRDNOZy Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:33:39 +0300 From: Tony Lindgren To: Russell King Cc: Linus Torvalds , Kevin Hilman , Daniel Walker , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ARM defconfig files Message-ID: <20100603213337.GB6499@atomide.com> References: <20100603074548.GA12104@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100603164623.GM30622@atomide.com> <20100603181303.GB25779@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100603181303.GB25779@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1689 Lines: 43 * Russell King [100603 21:07]: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 07:46:23PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Compiling in multiple ARM platforms is trickier, we would have to get > > rid of the duplicate defines like NR_IRQS, then have some common clock > > framework etc. Then figure out some way to get rid of Makefile.boot. > > Russell probably has some other things in mind that would have to be > > changed to make this happen. > > - Find someway to handle the wide variety of interrupt controllers. > - Be able to handle any multitude of V:P translations, including non-linear > alongside linear transations. > - Different PAGE_OFFSETs > - Different kernel VM layouts allowing for a variety of different ioremap > region sizes Some of these could be handled by allowing building a seprate instance for each platform compiled in. Maybe we could set them up with symlinks. How about a minimal generic relocatable ARM kernel and then we load the platform support as a module from ramdisk? :) > and so the list goes on... Yeah.. > > That way maybe you can wait a bit longer for the other defconfigs > > and as an extra bonus I won't get flamed for removing these omap > > defconfigs ;) > > Note that Linus is talking about removing all but one or two ARM > defconfigs - which means your omap3_defconfig will probably be > eventually culled. Yes but I also think we need to do something about this. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/