Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:47:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:47:08 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:55527 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:47:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:46:59 -0400 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Roman Zippel Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: devfs: BKL *not* taken while opening devices Message-ID: <20020429134659.A26165@devserv.devel.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3CCD811E.8689F4B0@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 07:40:08PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > I'm not convinced of that. It's not nearly a critical path and it's > > better to get even the "dumb" drivers safe than to risk having big > > security holes in there for years to come. > > The BKL doesn't make a driver safe, remember that it's released on > schedule. I know. But a LOT of in kernel and out-of kernel drives don't schedule in open and are therefore safe right now - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/