Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:34:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:34:42 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:62980 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:34:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:34:30 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Pavel Machek Cc: Larry McVoy , Florian Weimer , Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] BK license change In-Reply-To: <20020426042242.A294@toy.ucw.cz> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Pavel Machek wrote: > > In short: go build a better answer, and until you do it, how about > > easing off on the "BK is evil corporate software" mantra a bit? It's > > BK *is* evil corporate software, with unique trapdoor capabilities, and > with unique ability to take away rights from user any time it wants. BK is made available to us at no cost; BK is saving Linus and Marcelo a lot of work, making it possible for them to merge more patches into the kernel. If you only spent 10% of the energy you spent complaining on making a bitkeeper replacement, maybe you'd realise that Larry is making a very useful contribution. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/