Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752633Ab0FFHwM (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jun 2010 03:52:12 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:41701 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752227Ab0FFHwK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jun 2010 03:52:10 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RXzVKziueeLEPRf4SpHbjaRwPN3/YZJDte9Jm+ajuANVjC7G6LRFFuU2log7XGbpFM 09cL2RysrrHbcnkDAqu0jDu61UqefiNCtubo5pBZLNSwfBcR3X9UuSraos3j7HMKlfFG QMtubV1XIbQXBlFP3X8JyItTet/1Nsxrb1hBM= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20100603193045.GA7188@elte.hu> <20100603231153.GA11302@elte.hu> <20100603232302.GA16184@elte.hu> <20100604071354.GA14451@elte.hu> <20100604083423.GD15181@elte.hu> <1275653210.27810.39762.camel@twins> <1275731653.27810.41078.camel@twins> <20100605092851.6ee15f13@infradead.org> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 09:52:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration From: Vitaly Wool To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arve_Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= Cc: Arjan van de Ven , tytso@mit.edu, Florian Mickler , Peter Zijlstra , Brian Swetland , "H. Peter Anvin" , LKML , Neil Brown , James Bottomley , Alan Cox , Linux PM , Ingo Molnar , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , Felipe Balbi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1343 Lines: 34 2010/6/5 Arve Hj?nnev?g : > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:54:13 +0200 >> Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 17:10 -0700, Arve Hj?nnev?g wrote: >>> > > Trusted processes are assumed to be sane and idle when there is >>> > > nothing for them to do, allowing the machine to go into deep idle >>> > > states. >>> > > >>> > >>> > Neither the kernel nor our trusted user-space code currently meets >>> > this criteria. >>> >>> Then both need fixing. Really, that's the only sane approach. >> >> fwiw... in MeeGo we're seeing quite good idle times (> 1 seconds) >> without really bad hacks. >> > > We clearly have different standards for what we consider good. We > measure time suspended in minutes or hours, not seconds, and waking up > every second or two causes a noticeable decrease in battery life on > the hardware we have today. Are you stating that the existing Android implementation enters the suspended state for hours for any of the existing designs? ~Vitaly -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/