Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S315194AbSD2UlY>; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:41:24 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S315198AbSD2UlX>; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:41:23 -0400
Received: from mailsorter.ma.tmpw.net ([63.112.169.25]:34595 "EHLO
	mailsorter.ma.tmpw.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S315194AbSD2UlW>; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:41:22 -0400
Message-ID: <61DB42B180EAB34E9D28346C11535A78178051@nocmail101.ma.tmpw.net>
From: "Holzrichter, Bruce" <bruce.holzrichter@monster.com>
To: "'Andrew Theurer'" <habanero@us.ibm.com>,
        "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Hyperthreading and physical/logical CPU identification
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:41:10 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> 
> Yes, those are the two alternatives.  I agree B is unlikely, 
> but honestly I 
> thought a 31% improvement from hyperthreading seemed unlikely 
> as well.  
> Believe me, I am hoping situaiton A is the correct one!
> 
> -Andrew

Though I don't have a test platform, from published results, and depending
on what application, 31% for Hyperthreading enabled is within the realm of
possiblity.  

B.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/