Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 08:28:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 08:28:13 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:6406 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 08:27:59 -0500 Subject: Re: pdev_enable_device no longer used ? To: davej@suse.de Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 12:53:46 +0000 (GMT) Cc: ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru (Ivan Kokshaysky), rmk@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel Mailing List) In-Reply-To: from "davej@suse.de" at Dec 09, 2000 12:36:43 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If/When x86 (or all?) architectures use this, will it make sense to > remove the PCI space cache line setting from drivers ? > Or is there borked hardware out there that require drivers to say > "This cacheline size must be xxx bytes, anything else will break" ? If there is surely the driver can override it again before enabling the master bit or talking to the device ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/