Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:01:31 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
To: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
       Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>,
       Arve =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= <arve@android.com>,
       Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>, tytso@mit.edu,
       Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
       James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
       Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
       Linux PM <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration
Message-ID: <20100607150131.2038b802@schatten.dmk.lab>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim0JD4V0RTc6CRIADypqYhQo3JYp3dJs0l7g7Ps@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimEwznq9c_8lkuBMxEQ-42rdvpZEqA9Y71Cu-qC@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimKknOurmCffOpHjc1FjrP2MKf10pBwEEbLJPg_@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTil1NCX91bWhpXHtC88Opr29mNjdhXD9RXQ6DI0y@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin1Za3GvfIKbcZdx6TzjIHzCvsg5uaY_Vk4nJIh@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilQ1k78dDCYadOa1Wiyjm2nsBcRpxwdpGvYcf8z@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin7oM3gVwHbIHWqYV8yeC6bbQ4q2jDDxAgz3DwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100606133130.GA8513@srcf.ucam.org>
	<AANLkTimXTgZS_fZQa8hjIptJrCn756gF_xakT1IQiLWa@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100606152946.GA11351@srcf.ucam.org>
	<AANLkTilOq_5yUW1AIMH1qSE699gyRUTlzGPUVc4CrReY@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100606164326.GA12570@srcf.ucam.org>
	<AANLkTim0JD4V0RTc6CRIADypqYhQo3JYp3dJs0l7g7Ps@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 825
Lines: 29

On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 19:21:49 +0200
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> wrote:

> 2010/6/6 Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>:
> 
> > Suspend blocks prevent system suspend, not any per-device suspend.
> 
> Can you suspend a device which is holding a wake lock?
> 
> ~Vitaly

If you look at the suspend blocker patchset, you'll see that the only
patches adding calls to "suspend_is_blocked()" are 

PM: Opportunistic suspend support

and

PM: Abort task freezing if there is an active suspend blocker . 

Both are in generic suspend code and don't affect runtime pm.

Cheers,
Flo 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/