Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754484Ab0FGNIA (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:08:00 -0400 Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de ([194.150.191.11]:37327 "EHLO mail.lichtvoll.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752964Ab0FGNH7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:07:59 -0400 From: Martin Steigerwald To: tuxonice-devel@tuxonice.net Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [linux-pm] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Proposal for a new algorithm for reading & writing a hibernation image. Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:07:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33.2-tp42-toi-3.1-lowmem-free-991-992-04964-gf00c7ec-dirty; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) Cc: Nigel Cunningham , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , pm list , Maxim Levitsky , "TuxOnIce-devel" References: <9rpccea67yy402c975fqru8r.1275576653521@email.android.com> <201006062104.55869.rjw@sisk.pl> <4C0C843D.6030008@crca.org.au> (sfid-20100607_101218_800330_88257A1C) In-Reply-To: <4C0C843D.6030008@crca.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1336033.bEN4aNCQnZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006071507.56259.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3373 Lines: 98 --nextPart1336033.bEN4aNCQnZ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Montag 07 Juni 2010 schrieb Nigel Cunningham: > Hi. Hi Nigel and Rafael, hi everyone else involved, > On 07/06/10 05:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sunday 06 June 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > >> On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 15:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> On Sunday 06 June 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > ... > >=20 > >>> So how TuxOnIce helps here? > >>=20 > >> Very simple. > >>=20 > >> With swsusp, I can save 750MB (memory) + 250 Vram (vram) > >> With full memory save I can save (1750 MB of memory) + 250 MB of > >> vram.... > >=20 > > So what about being able to save 1600 MB total instead of the 2 GB > > (which is what we're talking about in case that's not clear)? Would > > it be _that_ _much_ worse? >=20 > That all depends on what is in the 400MB you discard. >=20 > The difference is "Just as if you'd never hibernated" vs something > closer to "Just as if you'd only just started up". We can't make > categorical statements because it really does depend upon what you > discard and what you want to do post-resume - that is, how useful the > memory you discard would have been. That's always going to vary from > case to case. Nigel and Rafael, how about just testing it? Whats needed to have 80% of the memory saved instead of 50%? I think its important to go the next steps towards a better snapshot in=20 mainline kernel even when you do not agree on the complete end result yet. What about =2D Rafael, you review the async write patches of Nigel. If they are good,= =20 IMHO they should go in as soon as possible. =2D Nigel and/or Rafael, you look at whats needed to save 80% instead of 50= %=20 of the memory and develop a patch for it ? Then this goes into one stable kernel series and be tested in the wild.=20 And if that approach does not suffice to give a similar experience than wit= h=20 TuxOnIce one could still look further. In that case I ask you Rafael, to=20 at least listen open-mindedly to practical experiences being told and to=20 ideas to improve the situation. I really want to see this make some progress instead of getting stuck in=20 discussion loops again. No offence meant - you do the all the development=20 work! - but the time spent here IMHO is better spent on reviewing and=20 furtherly refining the existing patches by Nigel and Jiri and developing a= =20 patchset for the 80% solution which should already help a lot. Does that incremental approach sound acceptable for the time being? IMHO *any* step forward helps! Ciao, =2D-=20 Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 --nextPart1336033.bEN4aNCQnZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkwM7yUACgkQmRvqrKWZhMdjuACeNw2R/TdbnUykRgEo9JSRN/CZ hHEAn1qBq0Pe0MX5cZ4KZZUjpGhw2ZVy =D/Wr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1336033.bEN4aNCQnZ-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/