Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:56:04 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>,
       Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, <tytso@mit.edu>,
       Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
       Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>,
       Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
       Linux PM <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
       Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
       Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration
Message-ID: <20100607175604.4c8f1fa4@schatten.dmk.lab>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1006061956510.4894-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
References: <20100606152946.GA11351@srcf.ucam.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1006061956510.4894-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 623
Lines: 21

On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 20:01:56 -0400 (EDT)
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:

> And since Android can reach essentially the same low-power
> state from idle as from suspend, it appears that they really don't need
> any kernel changes at all.

Well, perhaps a hint to the scheduler to fall through as fast as
possible into deepest idle?

> 
> Alan Stern
> 

Cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/