Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753013Ab0FGSO3 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:14:29 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:60608 "EHLO
	mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752660Ab0FGSO1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:14:27 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=MW14GAIQunJHhA2UNCUZtyBjTet0uE+XBxc3BP7wszaClwLyuFX2z+6Wq6l+LQ4jTm
         M0sWDfnveyilXMNreF0WwI9jasVv5IClR2OO57Bfrwr1Gnwim9FXue7ekXGxAaxfjqIw
         dFmBtnLXnnJKjuieimAqVVLOUMvzluFcWF+IM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:14:25 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTin2pPqOUx--9fIX3BH3e-cU6oCRufijcx_4ozx5@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: 2.6.35-rc2-git1 - include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked 
	rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
From: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
       Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, nauman@google.com,
       eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
       Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
       Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>,
       Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
       Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1848
Lines: 39

Hi All,

I just reproduced a warning I reported quite a while ago.? Is a patch
for this in the pipeline?

[??? 0.167267] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
[??? 0.167396] ---------------------------------------------------
[??? 0.167526] include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked
rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
[??? 0.167728]
[??? 0.167729] other info that might help us debug this:
[??? 0.167731]
[??? 0.168092]
[??? 0.168093] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
[??? 0.168337] no locks held by watchdog/0/5.
[??? 0.168462]
[??? 0.168463] stack backtrace:
[??? 0.168704] Pid: 5, comm: watchdog/0 Not tainted 2.6.35-rc2-git1 #8
[??? 0.168834] Call Trace:
[??? 0.168965]? [<ffffffff81064e9c>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9d/0xa5
[??? 0.169100]? [<ffffffff8102c1ce>] task_subsys_state+0x59/0x70
[??? 0.169232]? [<ffffffff8103189b>] __sched_setscheduler+0x19d/0x2f8
[??? 0.169365]? [<ffffffff8102a5ef>] ? need_resched+0x1e/0x28
[??? 0.169497]? [<ffffffff813c7d01>] ? schedule+0x586/0x619
[??? 0.169628]? [<ffffffff81081c33>] ? watchdog+0x0/0x8c
[??? 0.169758]? [<ffffffff81031a11>] sched_setscheduler+0xe/0x10
[??? 0.169889]? [<ffffffff81081c5d>] watchdog+0x2a/0x8c
[??? 0.170010]? [<ffffffff81081c33>] ? watchdog+0x0/0x8c
[??? 0.170141]? [<ffffffff81054a82>] kthread+0x89/0x91
[??? 0.170274]? [<ffffffff81003054>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[??? 0.170405]? [<ffffffff813ca480>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[??? 0.170536]? [<ffffffff810549f9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x91
[??? 0.170667]? [<ffffffff81003050>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
[    0.176751] lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/