Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753235Ab0FGSkh (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:40:37 -0400 Received: from n6-vm0.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([98.137.26.79]:39735 "HELO n6-vm0.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751580Ab0FGSkf (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:40:35 -0400 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 929905.68507.bm@omp127.mail.gq1.yahoo.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mqOn0o/Zsad6g3VlXC02po4+JJbt28/9k8OK5S7grbsittV83SkzIHl+cSIc6H9GkJ8SsLln9AF759ct3GJw7dUUAAnL2LBNpp2EPy+K0chs7ysECF/60+WIyADUo8hMgLcWrKaBXg1LzkZyVlYgdYpwmp83CXXLTQQKd6GRkN8=; Message-ID: <768161.83147.qm@web180312.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: OCakp24VM1nXTHTRV9x2HlFwFE.Xr4bHCIoUJTjTikCVLtv jHE59FDAU7nG_N6.2n4p25HfDkmA7XA9se6VwMdnFMc0Gm6ugt2LcKogSpRA fKq5XodQc9IiEHY6mg2CvEfHoRVeWC9CNYZPYLiNh_EmCf4fafJSd.IaFB4a j090bjo1kD.LuFwW5_xy6dpUhQucaYcv9ebcq7EuMaI9fTDNjIGBfidHZNpV uPmqnVIkf5cmyiq_.VoR7kQKvqkdwfK_lHrnHbJMg6OmeHPYD5Aqc1Ymunnu MIOWuXd3TlD5EuzD9nNmagwtVFgc6ZOpekPeqe9Yh5M.V13hfTe4FkLg7DXA Y6nKN9SDMofPVfUBVb7kbtE6D3FyzipNq X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.103.269680 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:40:34 -0700 (PDT) From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration To: Brian Swetland , Peter Zijlstra Cc: tytso@mit.edu, Neil Brown , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Felipe Balbi , Christoph Hellwig , Florian Mickler , James Bottomley , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Linux PM , Alan Cox , Arjan van de Ven In-Reply-To: <1275916830.1645.566.camel@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1159 Lines: 34 --- On Mon, 6/7/10, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > So what's up with this Binder stuff, from what I can see > its just > yet-another-CORBA. Why does it need a kernel part at all, > can't you > simply run with a user-space ORB instead? > > I really don't get why people keep re-inventing CORBA, That made me laugh. Do you realize that one of the earliest objections to CORBA was "why do people keep re-inventing RPC" ... :) (Simple answer: the existing stuff didn't solve enough of the right problems ... and it was easier (in a political sense) to come up with something new than to try fixing DCE or ONC (or whatever). Similar answers may still apply ... last I looked at CORBA, it didn't standardize desktop integration (or cell-phone equivalents), and the pure user-space versions suffered slowdowns when looking up object bindings. > there's some really nice (free) ORBs out there, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/