Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S313529AbSD3Nc5>; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:32:57 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313533AbSD3Nc4>; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:32:56 -0400
Received: from moutng1.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:53459 "EHLO
	moutng1.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S313529AbSD3Nc4> convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:32:56 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Christian =?iso-8859-1?q?Borntr=E4ger?= 
	<linux-kernel@borntraeger.net>
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>, Gabor Kerenyi <wom@tateyama.hu>
Subject: Re: What compiler to use
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:32:46 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
Cc: Frank Schaefer <frank.schafer@setuza.cz>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204301508100.1644-100000@mustard.heime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Message-Id: <200204301532.47054.linux-kernel@borntraeger.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> Is this common knowledge? Is 3.1 as stable as 2.95.[23] for compiling the
> kernel? Does it make any difference in performace?

Not quite.

http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s8-2

Gcc 2.95.3 is the recommended compiler for kernel 2.4.10 and later. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/