Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756976Ab0FJHUl (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2010 03:20:41 -0400 Received: from bld-mail14.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.99]:54561 "EHLO mail.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752602Ab0FJHUi (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2010 03:20:38 -0400 From: Dave Chinner To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, josef@redhat.com, jeffmerkey@gmail.com Subject: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] fsfreeze: fix sb vs bdev freeze/thaw b0rkage Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:19:49 +1000 Message-Id: <1276154395-24766-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3263 Lines: 85 The following series is for to address bugs in the emergency thawing code, as well as mismatcheѕ with freezing at the block layer and the superblock that break the freeze/thaw nesting order. The first two patches fix the emergency thaw infinite loop reported by Jeff Merkey and the deadlock on sb->s_umount that the infinite loop hid. These may be stable kernel candidates. The remainder of the patches address the bdev/sb mismatch and the fact that sb level freezing does not nest correctly. For all the places that the bdev interfaces are used, we need a superblock anyway so we may as well make freeze/thaw work only at the sb level. As such, this series moves all the nesting code to the sb from the bdev level and removes the freeze_bdev/thaw_bdev interfaces completely. It also converts the emergency thaw to work at the superblock level such that it will now thaw manually frozen filesystems. A *big* outstanding problem still exists - freezing takes an active reference to the superblock, so unmounting an frozen filesystem has some nasty and unexpected side effects. The existing code results in an unmountable block device: # mount /dev/vda /mnt/test # xfs_freeze -f /mnt/test # umount /mnt/test # grep test /proc/mounts # mkfs.xfs -f -l size=128m /dev/vda mkfs.xfs: /dev/vda contains a mounted filesystem Usage: mkfs.xfs .... # mount /dev/vda /mnt/test mount: /dev/vda already mounted or /mnt/test busy # At this point I can't get access to /dev/vda and needs a reboot to get it and /mnt/test back. This patch series results in the block device being mountable, but remains frozen across unmount/mount: # mount /dev/vda /mnt/test # xfs_freeze -f /mnt/test # umount /mnt/test # grep test /proc/mounts # mkfs.xfs -f -l size=128m /dev/vda mkfs.xfs: /dev/vda contains a mounted filesystem Usage: mkfs.xfs .... # mount /dev/vda /mnt/test # touch /mnt/test/foo & [1] 2647 # # xfs_freeze -u /mnt/test [1]+ Done sudo touch /mnt/test/foo # umount /mnt/test # mkfs.xfs -f -l size=128m /dev/vda meta-data=/dev/vda isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=262144 blks = sectsz=512 attr=2 data = bsize=4096 blocks=1048576, imaxpct=25 = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=2 = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1 realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0 # This behaviour is only marginally better than the existing behaviour (at least you can release the references). However, I don't really like either option - we used to disallow umount on a frozen filesystems to avoid this problem. So What is really supposed to happen when we unmount a frozen superblock? Should unmount return EBUSY? Should it be automatically thawed so it doesn't affect block device behaviour after unmount? Something else? Cheers, Dave. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/