Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759331Ab0FJOw4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:52:56 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:56432 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759313Ab0FJOwy (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:52:54 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=rR912iD8TqKBQWPhXASLR67rt2rT9ApkpBWj5XB9Duc= c=1 sm=0 a=eX2VPhT_8KEA:10 a=uEzv4HemXiYA:10 a=7U3hwN5JcxgA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=gMqfjgEr1zLu/65IO0LwxA==:17 a=HctP3hEG2wxs9diSdjAA:9 a=KZQCPycqfN8o5v7qVVvcM6THn-cA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=gMqfjgEr1zLu/65IO0LwxA==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.89.75 Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] tracing: Use class->reg() for all registering of events From: Steven Rostedt Reply-To: rostedt@goodmis.org To: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Frederic Weisbecker , Masami Hiramatsu , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli In-Reply-To: <20100609050534.GA5878@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1276011215.15884.96.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1276012661.2046.120.camel@twins> <20100608173559.GE2800@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1276024211.15884.107.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20100609050534.GA5878@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Organization: Kihon Technologies Inc. Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:52:51 -0400 Message-ID: <1276181571.12038.21.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1078 Lines: 31 On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 10:35 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > > > > I tested the patch and it fixed the regression where > > > perf record -e probe:do_fork -aR sleep 1 would fail. > > > > > > > Thanks! Unfortunately the patch does two things, one is to fix this > > regression, the other is a clean up. Linus is currently only wanting > > fixes now and may not accept the clean up part of this patch. Can you > > test the patch below. It only addresses the regression. > > > I tested this patch on the mainline(latest git), and perf record is able > to record events. However the other regressions still remain. I am > seeing these on mainline too. But this means that the problem that I'm responsible for is fixed with this patch, correct? If so, I'll package it up and add your "Tested-by:" tag. OK? Thanks, -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/