Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S316610AbSFPXOb>; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 19:14:31 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S316611AbSFPXOa>; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 19:14:30 -0400
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:52232 "EHLO
	www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S316610AbSFPXOa>;
	Sun, 16 Jun 2002 19:14:30 -0400
Message-ID: <3D0D1AF0.1050500@mandrakesoft.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 19:10:40 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Organization: MandrakeSoft
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/00200205
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dank@kegel.com
CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: napi backport to 2.4?
References: <3D0D17AA.D0D11732@kegel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 438
Lines: 16

dank@kegel.com wrote:
> How hard would it be to backport napi to 2.4?
> There were a few rumblings about that last year...


Unless DaveM's plans have changed, it should be in 2.4.20.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/