Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754656Ab0FKQCt (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:02:49 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70]:53023 "EHLO sj-iport-1.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754580Ab0FKQCr (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:02:47 -0400 Authentication-Results: sj-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEANb6EUyrR7H+/2dsb2JhbACee3GlVpoDhRgEg0w X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,404,1272844800"; d="scan'208";a="334229602" From: Roland Dreier To: Alexander Schmidt Cc: Linux RDMA , lkml , Stefan Roscher , Joachim Fenkes , Christoph Raisch , Hoang-Nam Nguyen Subject: Re: [PATCH] ib/ehca: bitmask handling for lock_hcalls References: <20100610110653.17885a81@alex-laptop> X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:02:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20100610110653.17885a81@alex-laptop> (Alexander Schmidt's message of "Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:06:53 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 544 Lines: 10 What is the impact of this problem? ie is this something we need to fix for 2.6.35? I suppose not, since the current code has been there a long time. -- Roland Dreier || For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/