Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932608Ab0FKUiC (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:38:02 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50335 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752290Ab0FKUiA (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:38:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100611.133811.52184181.davem@davemloft.net> To: dvomlehn@cisco.com Cc: to@dvomlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4][RFC] Introduction to sk_buff state checking From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20100611203350.GA28383@dvomlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net> References: <20100611203350.GA28383@dvomlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 858 Lines: 25 This is the second time you've submitted this patch set, it is also the second time that: 1) Your email client has emitted these strange "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org"@cisco.com addresses. I saw that you were specifically notified about this problem during the previous submission. What did you do to try and correct it? 2) You are not CC:'ing the networking developer mailing list "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Many networking developers do not read linux-kernel, so by not CC:'ing that list you are not reaching the folks most capable of reviewing your patches. Please fix this up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/