Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751863Ab0FLSXJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:23:09 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:42521 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751542Ab0FLSXH (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:23:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4C13D051.4060903@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:22:09 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , x86 Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, AMD: Extend support to future families References: <20100602182921.GA21557@aftab> <4C101B58.2090208@zytor.com> <20100612041504.GB14077@aftab> In-Reply-To: <20100612041504.GB14077@aftab> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 956 Lines: 26 On 06/11/2010 09:15 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Not yet. And I'm assuming you're driving at tagging it for -stable? > If yes, I think a stable tag makes sense since this way the distros > will pick it up more easily and we most definitely will need to do the > backport later otherwise. > > Do you need another version with the stable tag resent or is it easier > for you to edit the commit message of the one you have already? > No, I'm not -- Linus is being really snippy about wanting regressions only this cycle, which this is not. Once .35 is out you can talk to Greg about -stable. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/