Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755194Ab0FNB0s (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:26:48 -0400 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:55122 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753351Ab0FNB0q (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:26:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:26:39 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Jens Axboe Cc: Philipp Reisner , drbd-dev@linbit.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drbd tree with the block trees Message-Id: <20100614112639.ef45a777.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <4C107FBF.9050209@kernel.dk> References: <20100610135203.4649453a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4C107FBF.9050209@kernel.dk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__14_Jun_2010_11_26_39_+1000_oL/Hwo6W0EN0Jg5q" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2002 Lines: 51 --Signature=_Mon__14_Jun_2010_11_26_39_+1000_oL/Hwo6W0EN0Jg5q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jens, Philipp, On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:01:35 +0200 Jens Axboe wrote: > > I'm starting to think that it would be a little easier if you did not > pull the drbd tree, I really should be pulling that into my -next branch > instead. Given that the drbd tree has not been updated to match the increasingly different block tree, I have dropped it for today. There a a few possibilities here: - I just drop the drbd tree completely and it only gets merged into the block tree. - if the drbd tree doesn't actually depend on any of the features in the block tree then it could be rebased onto Linus tree (and I would cope with any merge fixups - as I do with many other trees). - if it does depend on things in the block tree, those particular features in the block tree could be put in a separate branch that is never rebased and then that branch could be merged into both the block and drbd trees (this has been done before e.g. stuff in the vfs tree. - the drbd tree could be rebased on tom of the current block tree (but then it must be kept up to date if the block tree is rebased). --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Mon__14_Jun_2010_11_26_39_+1000_oL/Hwo6W0EN0Jg5q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwVhU8ACgkQjjKRsyhoI8w7mACcC5IH+E4sX4sag6CLghdiHQuq bXoAn3C91BgaFpPPAZYnyFR/7zvMXsAD =OBWy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__14_Jun_2010_11_26_39_+1000_oL/Hwo6W0EN0Jg5q-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/