Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754219Ab0FNIJt (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:09:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27230 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751819Ab0FNIJr (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:09:47 -0400 Message-ID: <4C15E3C8.20407@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:09:44 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com CC: Dave Hansen , kvm , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/T/D][PATCH 2/2] Linux/Guest cooperative unmapped page cache control References: <20100608155140.3749.74418.sendpatchset@L34Z31A.ibm.com> <20100608155153.3749.31669.sendpatchset@L34Z31A.ibm.com> <4C10B3AF.7020908@redhat.com> <20100610142512.GB5191@balbir.in.ibm.com> <1276214852.6437.1427.camel@nimitz> <20100611045600.GE5191@balbir.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20100611045600.GE5191@balbir.in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1424 Lines: 36 On 06/11/2010 07:56 AM, Balbir Singh wrote: > >> Just to be clear, let's say we have a mapped page (say of /sbin/init) >> that's been unreferenced since _just_ after the system booted. We also >> have an unmapped page cache page of a file often used at runtime, say >> one from /etc/resolv.conf or /etc/passwd. >> >> Which page will be preferred for eviction with this patch set? >> >> > In this case the order is as follows > > 1. First we pick free pages if any > 2. If we don't have free pages, we go after unmapped page cache and > slab cache > 3. If that fails as well, we go after regularly memory > > In the scenario that you describe, we'll not be able to easily free up > the frequently referenced page from /etc/*. The code will move on to > step 3 and do its regular reclaim. > Still it seems to me you are subverting the normal order of reclaim. I don't see why an unmapped page cache or slab cache item should be evicted before a mapped page. Certainly the cost of rebuilding a dentry compared to the gain from evicting it, is much higher than that of reestablishing a mapped page. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/