Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755917Ab0FNJnu (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 05:43:50 -0400 Received: from mail09.linbit.com ([212.69.161.110]:44198 "EHLO mail09.linbit.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755797Ab0FNJns (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 05:43:48 -0400 From: Philipp Reisner Organization: LINBIT To: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drbd tree with the block trees Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:43:42 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.32-22-generic; KDE/4.4.2; i686; ; ) Cc: Stephen Rothwell , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20100610135203.4649453a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100614112639.ef45a777.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4C15F18C.3050905@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: <4C15F18C.3050905@kernel.dk> X-OTRS-FollowUp-SenderType: agent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006141143.42783.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2286 Lines: 55 Am Montag, 14. Juni 2010, um 11:08:28 schrieb Jens Axboe: > On 2010-06-14 03:26, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Jens, Philipp, > > > > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:01:35 +0200 Jens Axboe wrote: > >> I'm starting to think that it would be a little easier if you did not > >> pull the drbd tree, I really should be pulling that into my -next branch > >> instead. > > > > Given that the drbd tree has not been updated to match the increasingly > > different block tree, I have dropped it for today. > > > > There a a few possibilities here: > > - I just drop the drbd tree completely and it only gets merged > > > > into the block tree. > > > > - if the drbd tree doesn't actually depend on any of the features > > > > in the block tree then it could be rebased onto Linus tree (and I would > > cope with any merge fixups - as I do with many other trees). > > > > - if it does depend on things in the block tree, those particular > > > > features in the block tree could be put in a separate branch that is > > never rebased and then that branch could be merged into both the block > > and drbd trees (this has been done before e.g. stuff in the vfs tree. > > > > - the drbd tree could be rebased on tom of the current block tree > > > > (but then it must be kept up to date if the block tree is rebased). > > The thing with the dependencies is that sometimes they are true, > sometimes they are not. What I suggested to the drbd team is that they > always just base off Linus and then ask me to pull their changes, then I > will resolve any potential conflicts when that happens. The consequence > would be that you stop pulling the drbd tree separately. Ok, from now on I will use Linus most recent -rc as base and put DRBD patches on top of that. -- I will do this today (CEST timezone). Best, Phil -- : Dipl-Ing Philipp Reisner : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability : Tel: +43-1-8178292-50, Fax: +43-1-8178292-82 : http://www.linbit.com DRBD(R) and LINBIT(R) are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/