Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 04:35:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 04:34:59 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:52624 "HELO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 04:34:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:32:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: Robert Love , Alan Cox , "David S. Miller" , Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.19-pre10-ac2: O(1) scheduler merge, -A3. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 955 Lines: 28 On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > i have planned to submit the irqbalance patch for 2.4-ac real soon, which > > needs this function - current IRQ distribution on P4 SMP boxes is a > > showstopper. > > Can we add a config time option for irqbalance? I consider it extra > overhead for setups which can do the interrupt distribution via hardware > properly, [...] What x86 hardware do you have in mind? My main issue with irqbalance is the lack of testing it has - eg. a showstopper SMP-on-UP bug was found just two days ago. > [...] also irqbalance breaks NUMAQ horribly seeing as it assumes a > number of things like addressing modes. exactly what does it assume that breaks NUMAQ? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/