Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754673Ab0FNPEf (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:04:35 -0400 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:43665 "EHLO mail2.shareable.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754277Ab0FNPEe (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:04:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:04:25 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Philby John Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, David Daney , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: Fix bug using smp_processor_id() in preemptible ubi_bgt1d kthread Message-ID: <20100614150425.GC9550@shareable.org> References: <1276513457.16642.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1276513457.16642.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1565 Lines: 36 Philby John wrote: > mtd: Fix bug using smp_processor_id() in preemptible ubi_bgt1d kthread > > On a MIPS Cavium Octeon CN5020 when trying to create a UBI volume, > on the NOR flash, the kernel thread ubi_bgt1d calls > cfi_amdstd_write_buffers() --> do_write_buffer() --> > INVALIDATE_CACHE_UDELAY --> __udelay(). Its __udelay() that calls > smp_processor_id() in preemptible code, which you are not supposed to. > Fix the problem by disabling preemption. The MTD code just calls udelay(). Are you sure it isn't permitted to call udelay() from preemptible code? I think it is fine. Perhaps MIPS udelay() should be disabling preemption itself, or (as x86 does) using raw_smp_processor_id() instead? Or perhaps the x86 version is a bug because the current CPU might change during the delay loop? See git commit 5c1ea08215f1f830dfaf4819a5f22efca41c3832 "x86: enable preemption in delay" I don't think it makes sense to disable preemption in all udelay() calls in drivers, so my NAK to this MTD patch. To workaround, consider putting the preempt_disable in MIPS udelay(), or using raw_smp_processor_id() in it, after reading the above git commit's message. A proper fix would accept a context switch during the delay and rescale the remaining count, but even on x86 they haven't done that yet :-) Regards, -- Jamie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/