Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755877Ab0FNQ1p (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:27:45 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f204.google.com ([209.85.211.204]:36258 "EHLO mail-yw0-f204.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754890Ab0FNQ1o (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:27:44 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=rDdvCQ61zcJSt0b+jo8lWDqTVWNfIGVHavuvVDvEpP3OlvTaEsiae2F25rHwfysQpT B12+0hF1cztRDYrNXZePtoNRcs0F9UxlWw/+fk/f02SXG9i1EL0Q43fOy+n4L9vfxep5 Nm9kS8ibMoAPcmCIsW9FGmikKDX0+2lSjXIyM= From: Gene Heskett Organization: Organization? very little To: walt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Noticeable slow-down in 2.6.35-rc3 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:27:40 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201006131813.04096.gene.heskett@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006141227.40233.gene.heskett@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1855 Lines: 50 On Monday 14 June 2010, walt wrote: >On 06/13/2010 03:13 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> Unfortunately, this patch will not apply to my src tree for 2.6.35-rc3, >> even after I fixed the unwanted line wrap in the first active line. >> >> I get: >> >> [root@coyote linux-2.6.35-rc3]# patch -p1<../2.6.35-rc3-test.patch >> patching file net/core/skbuff.c >> Hunk #1 FAILED at 532. >> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/core/skbuff.c.rej >> >> Did my grabbing it with swiftfox damage it even further? >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c >> index 9f07e74..bcf2fa3 100644 >> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c >> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c >> @@ -532,6 +532,7 @@ static void __copy_skb_header(struct sk_buff *new, >> const struct sk_buff *old) new->ip_summed = old->ip_summed; It also seems that the whole string ">ip_" has been traded for the leading c in the var names. So that patch was totally trashed by a broken html converter by the time it actually got to my machine. Where can I get a pristine copy? I am also wondering if this has anything to do with my missing USB devices when booted to 2.6.35-rc3. In my case the symptoms are as it it did not recurse far enough up the various branches of my usb tree from hell to find everything. Thanks. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) FROM THE DESK OF Rapunzel Dear Prince: Use ladder tonight -- you're splitting my ends. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/