Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756443Ab0FNRQv (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:16:51 -0400 Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.158]:34725 "EHLO e37.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756403Ab0FNRQt (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:16:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:46:24 +0530 From: Balbir Singh To: Dave Hansen Cc: Avi Kivity , kvm , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/T/D][PATCH 2/2] Linux/Guest cooperative unmapped page cache control Message-ID: <20100614171624.GY5191@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20100608155153.3749.31669.sendpatchset@L34Z31A.ibm.com> <4C10B3AF.7020908@redhat.com> <20100610142512.GB5191@balbir.in.ibm.com> <1276214852.6437.1427.camel@nimitz> <20100611045600.GE5191@balbir.in.ibm.com> <4C15E3C8.20407@redhat.com> <20100614084810.GT5191@balbir.in.ibm.com> <1276528376.6437.7176.camel@nimitz> <20100614165853.GW5191@balbir.in.ibm.com> <1276535371.6437.7417.camel@nimitz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1276535371.6437.7417.camel@nimitz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1262 Lines: 31 * Dave Hansen [2010-06-14 10:09:31]: > On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 22:28 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > If you've got duplicate pages and you know > > that they are duplicated and can be retrieved at a lower cost, why > > wouldn't we go after them first? > > I agree with this in theory. But, the guest lacks the information about > what is truly duplicated and what the costs are for itself and/or the > host to recreate it. "Unmapped page cache" may be the best proxy that > we have at the moment for "easy to recreate", but I think it's still too > poor a match to make these patches useful. > That is why the policy (in the next set) will come from the host. As to whether the data is truly duplicated, my experiments show up to 60% of the page cache is duplicated. The first patch today is again enabled by the host. Both of them are expected to be useful in the cache != none case. The data I have shows more details including the performance and overhead. -- Three Cheers, Balbir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/