Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 09:14:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 09:14:42 -0400 Received: from flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.232]:19351 "EHLO flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 09:14:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 09:16:07 -0400 To: akpm@zip.com.au Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91 Message-ID: <20020617131607.GA2748@rushmore> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: rwhron@earthlink.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1772 Lines: 50 >> tiobench.pl --size 2048 --numruns 3 --threads 128 # 384 MB ram in machine > From your trace it would seem that writeout completion has not > occurred against one or more pages. Could be that the device > driver lost an interrupt, or it failed to deliver completion > for one or more BIO segments, or something screwed up at the > VFS level. > I am (of course ;)) disinclined to believe the latter, mainly > because of the amount of testing I do here. Eight-hour Cerberus > runs on quad CPU, five IDE disks and six SCSI disks all chugging > along, no probs. > Is it reproducible? Are you able to try it on a different machine? > On other disks in the same machine? tiobench had a similar livelock in 2.5.19, 2.5.19 + 2 versions of wli's lazy-buddy allocator, 2.5.20, 2.5.21, and 2.5.21 with the request queue size change we talked about. However, when I tried it just now on a different disk and filesystem type (reiser instead of ext2) it didn't happen. The non-reproduced livelock didn't have any of the previous stress testing run against the machine though. Since the tiobench livelock appeared in 2.5.19, the following kernels have completed all tests. 2.4.19-pre10 2.5.20-dj3 2.4.19-pre10-ac2 2.4.19-pre10-aa1 2.5.20-dj4 2.4.19-pre10-jam2 2.4.19-pre10-jam2-O2 2.4.19-pre10-jam2-O3 2.4.18-cmpr-cache 2.4.19-pre10-mjc1 2.5.22 is out now and I'm trying that. If it has a problem, I'm inclined to rebuild the ext2 that tiobench, osdb, and dbench run on. (may not help, but it won't hurt :) -- Randy Hron - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/