Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757311Ab0FPKBG (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:01:06 -0400 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:59405 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751303Ab0FPKBE (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:01:04 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] signals: introduce send_sigkill() helper Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Andrew Morton , Roland McGrath , "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" , LKML , linux-mm , David Rientjes , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Nick Piggin , Minchan Kim In-Reply-To: <20100613152918.GA8024@redhat.com> References: <20100610010023.GB4727@redhat.com> <20100613152918.GA8024@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20100616185942.72D2.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:00:59 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1333 Lines: 38 > Andrew, please drop > > signals-introduce-send_sigkill-helper.patch > > I am stupid. > > On 06/10, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > Cleanup, no functional changes. > > > > There are a lot of buggy SIGKILL users in kernel. For example, almost > > every force_sig(SIGKILL) is wrong. force_sig() is not safe, it assumes > > that the task has the valid ->sighand, and in general it should be used > > only for synchronous signals. send_sig(SIGKILL, p, 1) or > > send_xxx(SEND_SIG_FORCED/SEND_SIG_PRIV) is not right too but this is not > > immediately obvious. > > > > The only way to correctly send SIGKILL is send_sig_info(SEND_SIG_NOINFO) > > No, SEND_SIG_NOINFO doesn't work too. Oh, can't understand what I was > thinking about. current is the random task, but send_signal() checks > if the caller is from-parent-ns. > > > Note: we need more cleanups here, this is only the first change. > > We need the cleanups first. Until then oom-killer has to use force_sig() > if we want to kill the SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE tasks too. This definitely needed. OOM-Killer is not racist ;) Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/