Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758233Ab0FPO6c (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:58:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42703 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752189Ab0FPO6a (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:58:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:58:27 -0300 From: Glauber Costa To: Avi Kivity Cc: Jason Wang , Zachary Amsden , mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] Fix a possible backwards warp of kvmclock Message-ID: <20100616145827.GP19104@mothafucka.localdomain> References: <1276587259-32319-1-git-send-email-zamsden@redhat.com> <1276587259-32319-12-git-send-email-zamsden@redhat.com> <4C18872E.4030105@redhat.com> <20100616135845.GM19104@mothafucka.localdomain> <4C18DBEE.70600@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C18DBEE.70600@redhat.com> X-ChuckNorris: True User-Agent: Jack Bauer Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1515 Lines: 27 On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 05:13:02PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/16/2010 04:58 PM, Glauber Costa wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 04:11:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >>Zachary Amsden wrote: > >>>Kernel time, which advances in discrete steps may progress much slower > >>>than TSC. As a result, when kvmclock is adjusted to a new base, the > >>>apparent time to the guest, which runs at a much higher, nsec scaled > >>>rate based on the current TSC, may have already been observed to have > >>>a larger value (kernel_ns + scaled tsc) than the value to which we are > >>>setting it (kernel_ns + 0). > >>> > >>This is one issue of kvmclock which tries to supply a clocksource whose > >>precision may even higher than host. > >What if we export to the guest the current clock resolution, and when doing guest > >reads, simply chop whatever value we got to the lowest acceptable value? > > The clock resolution can change, and while we can expose it reliably > through pvclock, do we need a notification so that the guest can > update other internal structures? I believe the only thing we need is to warn the guest whenever this changes. We can probably fit it in one of the paddings we have, and add a flag to say it is valid (now that we have the infrastructure). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/