Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:03:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:03:04 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:8386 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:03:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:02:20 -0400 From: Pete Zaitcev Message-Id: <200206172102.g5HL2K011511@devserv.devel.redhat.com> To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.22: common code changes for s/390. In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 793 Lines: 19 > --- linux-2.5.22/include/linux/auto_fs.h Mon Jun 17 04:31:22 2002 > +++ linux-2.5.22-s390/include/linux/auto_fs.h Tue Jun 4 09:52:06 2002 > @@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ > * If so, 32-bit user-space code should be backwards compatible. > */ > > -#if defined(__sparc__) || defined(__mips__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__powerpc__) > +#if defined(__sparc__) || defined(__mips__) || defined(__x86_64) \ > + || defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__s390__) Sure it's not missing __ at the end of x86_64? Testing if anyone reads it, are you :) -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/