Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759602Ab0FPUkQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:40:16 -0400 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:39746 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751595Ab0FPUkO (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:40:14 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6015"; a="44506604" Subject: Re: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue From: Daniel Walker To: Tejun Heo Cc: mingo@elte.hu, awalls@radix.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org, dhowells@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net, oleg@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk In-Reply-To: <4C1932FB.3000404@kernel.org> References: <1276551467-21246-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <4C17C598.7070303@kernel.org> <1276631037.6432.9.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <4C18BF40.40607@kernel.org> <1276694825.9309.12.camel@m0nster> <4C18D1FD.9060804@kernel.org> <1276695665.9309.17.camel@m0nster> <4C18D574.1040903@kernel.org> <1276697146.9309.27.camel@m0nster> <4C18DC69.10704@kernel.org> <1276698880.9309.44.camel@m0nster> <4C18E4B7.5040702@kernel.org> <1276701074.9309.60.camel@m0nster> <4C18F2B8.9060805@kernel.org> <1276705838.9309.94.camel@m0nster> <4C1901E9.2080907@kernel.org> <1276712547.9309.172.camel@m0nster> <4C191BE9.1060400@kernel.org> <1276716999.9309.208.camel@m0nster> <4C192B94.9020601@kernel.org> <1276719599.9309.243.camel@m0nster> <4C1932FB.3000404@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:40:12 -0700 Message-ID: <1276720812.9309.266.camel@m0nster> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 985 Lines: 25 On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 22:24 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 06/16/2010 10:19 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > >> I don't have any problem with that. I would be almost happy to get > >> your NACK. > > > > Oh yeah? why is that? > > Because the discussion isn't leading anywhere and I've already thrown > almost everything I can think of, so if I haven't convinced you yet > there's very low probability that I'll be able to do with further > discussion. So, I duly collected your Nacked-by: on the reason that > cmwq doesn't allow setting priorities from userland. > > Thanks and have a good night. Ok, and please don't try to summarize why there is a NAK'ed-by, if people want to know they can contact me directly or read this thread. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/