Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759416Ab0FQCuz (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:50:55 -0400 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:49861 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752112Ab0FQCuy (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:50:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:50:52 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Kenji Kaneshige Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, macro@linux-mips.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, eike-kernel@sf-tec.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: ioremap: fix wrong physical address handling Message-ID: <20100617025052.GH9298@parisc-linux.org> References: <4C197A49.6020400@jp.fujitsu.com> <4C197A9E.5040509@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C197A9E.5040509@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1687 Lines: 41 On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:30:06AM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > Index: linux-2.6.34/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.34.orig/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c 2010-06-15 04:43:00.978332015 +0900 > +++ linux-2.6.34/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c 2010-06-15 05:32:59.291693007 +0900 > @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ > static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr, > unsigned long size, unsigned long prot_val, void *caller) > { > - unsigned long pfn, offset, vaddr; > - resource_size_t last_addr; > + unsigned long offset, vaddr; > + resource_size_t pfn, last_pfn, last_addr; I have a hard time understanding this change. pfn is always a physical address shifted by PAGE_SHIFT. So a 32-bit pfn supports up to 44-bit physical addresses. Are your addresses above 44-bits? > @@ -115,7 +113,7 @@ > * Mappings have to be page-aligned > */ > offset = phys_addr & ~PAGE_MASK; > - phys_addr &= PAGE_MASK; > + phys_addr = (phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) << PAGE_SHIFT; I'd rather see PAGE_MASK fixed. Would this work? #define PAGE_SIZE (_AC(1,UL) << PAGE_SHIFT) -#define PAGE_MASK (~(PAGE_SIZE-1)) +#define PAGE_MASK (~(PAGE_SIZE-1ULL)) -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/