Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758407Ab0FQKad (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:30:33 -0400 Received: from gir.skynet.ie ([193.1.99.77]:59089 "EHLO gir.skynet.ie" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753986Ab0FQKac (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:30:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:30:13 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Chinner , Chris Mason , Nick Piggin , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Christoph Hellwig , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] vmscan: Setup pagevec as late as possible in shrink_inactive_list() Message-ID: <20100617103012.GA25567@csn.ul.ie> References: <1276514273-27693-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <1276514273-27693-9-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <20100616164309.254b1a0d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100616164309.254b1a0d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1790 Lines: 41 On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 04:43:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:17:49 +0100 > Mel Gorman wrote: > > > shrink_inactive_list() sets up a pagevec to release unfreeable pages. It > > uses significant amounts of stack doing this. This patch splits > > shrink_inactive_list() to take the stack usage out of the main path so > > that callers to writepage() do not contain an unused pagevec on the > > stack. > > You can get the entire pagevec off the stack - just make it a > static-to-shrink_inactive_list() pagevec-per-cpu. > That idea has been floated as well. I didn't pursue it because Dave said that giving page reclaim a stack diet was never going to be the full solution so I didn't think the complexity was justified. I kept some of the stack reduction stuff because a) it was there and b) it would give kswapd extra headroom when calling writepage. > Locking just requires pinning to a CPU. We could trivially co-opt > shrink_inactive_list()'s spin_lock_irq() for that, but > pagevec_release() can be relatively expensive so it'd be sad to move > that inside spin_lock_irq(). It'd be better to slap a > get_cpu()/put_cpu() around the whole thing. > It'd be something interesting to try out when nothing else was happening but I'm not going to focus on it for the moment unless I think it will really help this stack overflow problem. -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/