Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756942Ab0FRHkL (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:40:11 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:41022 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756433Ab0FRHkE (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:40:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:39:50 +0200 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Magnus Damm , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Paul Mundt , Dmitry Torokhov , Eric Miao , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Driver core: reduce duplicated code Message-ID: <20100618073950.GA12822@pengutronix.de> References: <1276591677-4678-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <1276591677-4678-2-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20100615090500.GA17595@pengutronix.de> <20100616205332.GB15837@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20100616205332.GB15837@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:215:17ff:fe12:23b0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2085 Lines: 53 Hi Greg, On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 01:53:32PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:05:00AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > > This makes the two similar functions platform_device_register_simple > > > and platform_device_register_data one line inline functions using a new > > > generic function platform_device_register_resndata. > > I forgot to add some comments to this mail, ... sorry. > > > > - I'm not completely happy with the name of the new function. If > > someone has a better name please tell me. > > I don't like it either, what is "resndata" supposed to stand for? resources and data -> res'n'data -> resndata. > > - can platform_device_register_resndata be moved to __init_or_module? > > I doubt it, but try it and see if a build warns about it. for x86_64_defconfig + MODULES=n there are two section mismatches: dock_add regulatory_init regulatory_init is only called from static int __init cfg80211_init(void) . (I just sent a patch[1] that moves regulatory_init to .init.text.) dock_add (in drivers/acpi/dock.c) is a bit harder. I will take a look later if it can go to .init.text (together with a few more functions), too. > > - I moved the kernel docs to the header but didn't test if they are > > picked up when generating docs. Even if not, there is no better > > place, is there? > > No, that's the proper place, but make sure the docbook source is also > picking up the .h file, I don't know if it currently does. It does not, will fix in a v2. Thanks Uwe [1] http://mid.gmane.org/1276846735-12105-2-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/