Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 21:11:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 21:11:28 -0400 Received: from deimos.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.190]:63730 "EHLO deimos.hpl.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 21:11:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 18:11:28 -0700 To: Jeff Garzik Cc: irda-users@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH] : ir250_cache_wait_data-2.diff Message-ID: <20020617181128.F6338@bougret.hpl.hp.com> Reply-To: jt@hpl.hp.com References: <20020610175300.E21783@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <3D0A7219.6000303@mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3D0A7219.6000303@mandrakesoft.com>; from jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com on Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 06:45:45PM -0400 Organisation: HP Labs Palo Alto Address: HP Labs, 1U-17, 1501 Page Mill road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. E-mail: jt@hpl.hp.com From: Jean Tourrilhes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 736 Lines: 17 On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 06:45:45PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Patch did not apply... I think you're a victim of __FUNCTION__ > cleanups, possibly. Whoever did those in recent 2.5.x kernels didn't > bother notifying any maintainers :( By the way, is there any more cleanups in the pipeline ? I mean, the whitespace cleanups missed 50% of the code and the __FUNCTION__ cleanups missed 90% of the occurences, so should I expect more or can I redo my patches this week ? Thanks... Jean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/