Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755891Ab0FRT0N (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:26:13 -0400 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:42897 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752030Ab0FRT0L (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:26:11 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6017"; a="44714977" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] msm: Add gpiolib devices to MSM7x30 and QSD8x50. From: Daniel Walker To: Gregory Bean Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1276888375-13221-1-git-send-email-gbean@codeaurora.org> References: <1276888375-13221-1-git-send-email-gbean@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:26:04 -0700 Message-ID: <1276889164.30433.54.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1501 Lines: 35 On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 12:12 -0700, Gregory Bean wrote: > Hi folks: > > Here is a proposed patch series which adds the configuration and devices > needed to enable gpiolib on the MSM7x30 and QSD8x50 chipsets. > > Patch 1 adds the register mapping information for all supported > MSM/QSD targets. I wasn't sure about adding register definitions for boards > which weren't yet using those definitions, but the alternative was to have > each following patch change gpio_hw.h over and over, so I put all the > definitions in at once. Thoughts? > > Patch 2 adds the first target, the 7x30, as well as some generic macros > to ease the definition of the gpio devices and their platform data, > as this is long-winded, but mindless and repetitive work. I considered > putting the generic macro-definitions in their own patch, but without > any targets to use them it seemed a little silly to leave them on their > own and I ended up attaching them to the first patch to use them - > what do y'all think? Does it warrant being split up? > > Patch 3 adds device configuration for the 8x50. Does it bisect? Daniel -- Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/