Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933121Ab0FRTvi (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:51:38 -0400 Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.21.11]:45976 "HELO cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S933135Ab0FRTvd (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:51:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=fFWjXTV/0nvB3wsEsl8xY5QScCrl588yLIbFJRYEIHDxBcqdeN+Li+aLe62s18PPnIbc0USJR7PabDtPDkgYi+T0dudfeZ2Cwp2k27xxpJcrhECrvBZmspNq3Jy3+JNK; Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:49:56 -0700 From: Jesse Barnes To: Yinghai Lu Cc: "Justin P. Mattock" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5]pci:setup_bus.c Fix warning: variable 'retval' set but not used Message-ID: <20100618124956.40c869a0@virtuousgeek.org> In-Reply-To: <4C1BBF7D.8090904@kernel.org> References: <1276666434-11227-1-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com> <1276666434-11227-5-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com> <20100618102330.29eccb5b@virtuousgeek.org> <4C1BBF7D.8090904@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.110.194.140 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3000 Lines: 73 On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:48:29 -0700 Yinghai Lu wrote: > On 06/18/2010 10:23 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:33:53 -0700 > > "Justin P. Mattock" wrote: > > > >> The below patch fixes a warning message when using gcc 4.6.0 > >> CC drivers/pci/setup-bus.o > >> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c: In function 'pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources': > >> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c:868:6: warning: variable 'retval' set but not used > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock > >> > >> --- > >> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 2 -- > >> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c > >> index 19b1113..215590b 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c > >> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c > >> @@ -865,7 +865,6 @@ void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge) > >> struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate; > >> int tried_times = 0; > >> struct resource_list_x head, *list; > >> - int retval; > >> unsigned long type_mask = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM | > >> IORESOURCE_PREFETCH; > >> > >> @@ -874,7 +873,6 @@ void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge) > >> again: > >> pci_bus_size_bridges(parent); > >> __pci_bridge_assign_resources(bridge, &head); > >> - retval = pci_reenable_device(bridge); > >> pci_set_master(bridge); > >> pci_enable_bridges(parent); > >> > > I sent following patch several weeks ago, can you put that in pci-next? > > Subject: [PATCH] pciehp: Enable bridges at last for multiple try assigning > > Found one PCIe Module with several bridges "cold" hotadd doesn't work. > > the root cause: > 1. BIOS assign small range the parent bridges. > 2. First try for hotadd only can make some bridges get resource assigned. > 3. Second will update parent bridge res, get right sizes for all child bridges > and devices, but resource for child bridges are not set to HW register. > Because first try already enable those bridges, so __pci_bridge_assign_resource > skip the setting step. > > So try to move enabling of child bridges to last and only do that one time > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu Yeah I had a hard time following the changelog, but just looked it over. Looks safe, but Justin will still need to check the return value on pci_reenable_device. Justin, we don't want a message on every reenable, just on ones that fail. So can you protect your printk with if (retval) instead? You'll need to refresh it based on my linux-next branch in a few minutes, as I'm pushing Yinghai's patch now. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/