Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755246Ab0FSI7G (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jun 2010 04:59:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:35377 "EHLO mail-ww0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754627Ab0FSI7C (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jun 2010 04:59:02 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=OUsfgBiotVz39TBMPkPqFJNEjyoUYAAuhqEO7H7vnuPX2MIxL9q9qQ9+FxaP6YfIh+ caF06MFkXO9aWi3TBrlbGVoNghmLlocfYtpCzn5jKGo2iDObHxi/nR2sb0gDOLmuArYq +QmghwdHKuJ7HBinqEkjwOayC5yTinmJ6LhwY= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:59:00 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: I2KOjChVQl7RhIXPfsI5dcaARZc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND][REGRESSION] um: CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y broken From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: richard -rw- weinberger Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tabbott@ksplice.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, stable@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2152 Lines: 60 On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 00:23, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 19:50, richard -rw- weinberger >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven >>> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 17:22, richard -rw- weinberger >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 15:49, richard -rw- weinberger >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Andrew, Linus, Jeff, ... anyone? >>>>>>> Please apply this patch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is still broken. :( >>>>>> >>>>>> I wanted to verify Tim's patch, but after enabling CONFIG_STATIC_LINK, >>>>>> it fails to link >>>>>> (with or without your patch): >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> BTW: Does CONFIG_STATIC_LINK work for you when you revert commit >>>>> 5d150a97f9391f5bcd7ba0d59d7a11c3de3cea80 (um: Clean up linker script >>>>> using standard macros)? >>>> >>>> Still the same linking errors ;-( >>>> >>> >>> Are you using a non-x86 environment? >>> Maybe CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is more broken than i thought. >> >> I'm using amd64 on Ubuntu 10.04. >> > > Can please you test this patch? > http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/03cd264b00551949?pli=1 Matthew's patch fixes the linking problem for me. Interestingly, CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y now boots fine for me, with and without Tim's patch? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/