Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757388Ab0FTWd4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:33:56 -0400 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:40203 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756089Ab0FTWdu (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:33:50 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Qe6LveCNAu5MZHGs3lGepYT+666hiffDRCYXC0duF77Bk3CjpYHGL0qDMcOzt7smgl FjYcJWrGCWLUxeP71hw0SoGS3/agtJSvCvd8q0PTWgR92hbBbio0r8YYVV1p91DEfdVd CfjiazxyvAOcDfMi91Scmh4IZrg5kVqZlUf70= Message-ID: <4C1E9752.8040508@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:33:54 -0700 From: "Justin P. Mattock" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091114 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Layton CC: linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6 v2]cifs Fix warnings variables set but not used References: <1276980427-24728-1-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com> <20100620171713.782e9104@tlielax.poochiereds.net> In-Reply-To: <20100620171713.782e9104@tlielax.poochiereds.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1370 Lines: 40 >> /* since paths are not looked up by component - the parent >> directories are presumed to be good here */ >> renew_parental_timestamps(direntry); >> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c >> index 75541af..73e540b 100644 >> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c >> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c >> @@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ static int cifs_partialpagewrite(struct page *page, unsigned from, unsigned to) >> int rc = -EFAULT; >> int bytes_written = 0; >> struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb; >> - struct cifsTconInfo *pTcon; >> + struct cifsTconInfo *pTcon __attribute__((unused)); > > This variable can just be removed (along with the spot where it gets > set later). > >> struct inode *inode; >> struct cifsFileInfo *open_file; >> > > one thing I want to make sure of before sending this out, is with file.c if I remove *pTcon another warning shows up: CC [M] fs/cifs/file.o fs/cifs/file.c: In function 'cifs_partialpagewrite': fs/cifs/file.c:1314:23: warning: variable 'cifs_sb' set but not used with the original patch I had removed this as well, should I do this or is this not a good idea? Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/