Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932407Ab0FULrE (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:47:04 -0400 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:58885 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932344Ab0FULq7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:46:59 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] oom: unify CAP_SYS_RAWIO check into other superuser check Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Minchan Kim , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki In-Reply-To: References: <20100617104756.FB8F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20100621204605.B545.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:46:53 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 729 Lines: 22 > On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > > > Now, CAP_SYS_RAWIO check is very strange. if the user have both > > CAP_SYS_ADMIN and CAP_SYS_RAWIO, points will makes 1/16. > > > > Superuser's 1/4 bonus worthness is quite a bit dubious, but > > considerable. However 1/16 is obviously insane. > > > > This is already obsoleted by the heuristic rewrite that is already under > review. Huh? I don't think this patch conflict against your. but I'm ok to pending awhile. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/