Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932148Ab0FUQBO (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:01:14 -0400 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:40820 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757152Ab0FUQBK (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:01:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:01:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: markgross@thegnar.org cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux-pm mailing list , Matthew Garrett , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dmitry Torokhov , Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= , Neil Brown , mark gross <640e9920@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Avoid losing wakeup events during suspend In-Reply-To: <20100621061345.GF9735@gvim.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 879 Lines: 24 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010, mark gross wrote: > Your confused about what problem this patch attempts to solve. I don't think so. Rafael's description was pretty clear. > There is > a pm_qos patch in the works to address the suspend blocker > functionality. > http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2010-June/026760.html No. That patch addresses something _similar_ to the suspend blocker functionality. The fact remains, though, that pm_qos is not used during system suspend (the /sys/power/state interface), hence changes to pm_qos won't solve the system-suspend problems that suspend blockers do solve. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/