Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 12:28:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 12:28:29 -0400 Received: from host194.steeleye.com ([216.33.1.194]:32273 "EHLO pogo.mtv1.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 12:28:28 -0400 Message-Id: <200206181628.g5IGSP805899@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Kai Germaschewski cc: James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: make dep fails on 2.5.22 In-Reply-To: Message from Kai Germaschewski of "Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:22:21 CDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:28:25 -0500 From: James Bottomley X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 656 Lines: 16 kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de said: > Well, actually, it looks right to me: It says to build the .ver file, > we need the header (since it'll be included during the process). OK, I can fix all the SCSI auto generated headers this way and submit the patch. By "wrong" I meant it doesn't appeal to my programmer's sense of laziness to have two separate rules for the same thing, but I can live with it. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/